Skip to main content

Old lay the field article

Originally posted on betting.betfair many years ago, no longer displayed, so I thought I'd repost it for the benefit of those who regularly ask about it. All images from the old interface, the principles remain the same!

Horse Racing - now with video clip

One trade you may consider on horse racing markets is to 'lay the field at odds-on'. Take a look at how many horses get beaten these days at odds-on in-running - it means punters are over-reacting and losing, so why not be on the other side of that and profit from it?

Objective
To create a profitable book based upon laying a number of horses at a pre-determined price during the race.

How to do this
To have a profitable book your combined lay bets need to exceed 100%. Therefore if you lay 2 horses at 1.8 (55%) you would be a winner. Should you decide to lay @ 3.0 (33.33%) you will need to lay at least 3.1 horses at that price during the race.

The price you choose will vary depending on your research or testing (keep liability small). Factor you may want to consider include distance of the race, flat or jumps, hurdles or fences, ground or size of field.

Below are three easy steps, using an example of a race at Brighton in which orders were entered to lay the whole field should any of them trade at 1.8 in running.

Step 1
Go to a horse race. Click on the 'Place Bets' tab on the right of the market and select 'Lay All'.



Step 2
Enter the price you want to lay each of the selections and then click 'liability' - the word NOT the dot.



Enter the amount you are prepared to lose on the market (in this instance £10) and click 'Ok'. This will automatically calculate how much you need to lay each selection to risk your liability. Remember you will only pay out on one horse, therefore the worst result is £10 (if two horses dead-heat your loss would be £5 x 2 as winnings are halved).



Step 3
Before placing your bet just check that your liability for each selection is £10. Having submitted the bet, if placing the orders before the race has started, you will need to click 'keep' and submit to ensure they are not erased when the market suspends at the beginning of the race.



So what will happen next?
There are a number of different scenarios that may occur.

Scenario 1 - The winner is the only horse to trade through 1.8 in running and you had laid it to lose £10. In this instance, Fairly Honest.

LOSS ON MARKET is £10



Scenario 2 - What actually happened in this race was two horses traded through the price during the race. Fairly Honest looked the likely winner two furlongs out but got tired in the closing stages and was collared by Lancaster Lad. You have now laid two horses to lose £10, with stakes of £12.50 on each one from the backer. As the stake from the other bet (£12.50) was greater than the risk (£10), it makes no difference which of the two horses won – either way you profit £2.50.
PROFIT ON MARKET is £2.50 less commission (a return against your worst result of 25% - comm.)





Scenario 3 - Even better, three horses trade through the price during the race. On the winner you will lose £10. On the two beaten horses you will win £25 (£12.50 x 2).
PROFIT ON MARKET is £15 less commission

And so on.......the more that trade through the price the more you will profit from the market.

Pulling your orders

Another angle on this trade is to cancel all the remaining lay bets when one has been matched. Taking the above example your maximum profit on the race is limited to £12.50 (the 1st to trade through 1.8 is beaten) while your maximum loss would be £10 (if it goes onto win).

Now that you've read the article, try watching the video clip.

Other examples on my blog - My favourite trading strategy and another. Read the comments section, plenty of good shared material in there from others who have done a lot more with it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also, ...

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur...