Skip to main content

Ballarat Cup Preview

The Ballarat Cup is one of the jewels of Australasian harness racing yet puzzlingly (or is that politically), it is not a Grand Circuit event. This time of year is as good as it gets in Victoria, and signing in on the blog for the first time is Jay Wilkins, @TearitallaJay.

---------------------------

2014 Ballarat Cup

Next week's Hunter Cup creates a couple of interesting sub-plots for the top fancies in this year's Ballarat Cup. The Ballarat Trotting Club has assembled a very competitive line-up for their Cup, despite the focus of many stables being drawn to Victoria’s showpiece standing start (SS) classic on 1 Feb.

The impact began when Shepparton Cup winner The Gold Ace was deemed to have galloped away from the SS, basically ending his chances of gaining a Hunter Cup place. Hunter Cup qualifying rules state:

A condition of the Hunter Cup is that “a horse must have contested and began safely in a minimum of one standing start race in the 12 months prior.”

This ruling would have forced his trainer Luke McCarthy to run him in the SS Pure Steel on Cup night to get him qualified for his major goal. The plot thickened when HRV stewards changed their decision, ruling that The Gold Ace “did step away from the tapes safely”. Strangely he remains out of the draw in SS races? As an owner,I hope this appeal option is available across the board for all horses.

So a clear win for Ballarat & stewards were hoping the drama would quickly be forgotten. As luck would have it, The Gold Ace drew gate one ensuring he would start a short price fave.

The million-dollar earning son of Bettors Delight is the automatic leader, having enough early speed to have led from gate seven in the Victoria Cup. I've heard talk that he may get crossed; this is fantasy unless for some reason he walks out. Always having a reputation as a brilliant pacer through his classic years in NZ, his move to the McCarthys for this preparation has seen him show real strength,sitting parked in the Shepparton Cup before holding off his rivals.

Clear second pick is Andy Gath’s Caribbean Blaster. Neatly drawn to sit close, he’s already a multiple Group 1 winner despite being a freshman on the Grand Circuit. He’s won a Victoria Cup from virtually last & saves his best form for the big stage.

The query horse is Christen Me, best of his age at four he’s teased in his first year at this level with a couple of amazing Group 1 placings in the Miracle Mile & Victoria Cup (how didn't he win?) Fairly plain efforts at his last two at Cambridge & an extreme outside front row draw make it tough but he has X factor, huge upside & Dexter Dunn

Which leads us to Smoken Up, warhorse & hero to millions. Personally I'm over him. Clearly he’s been a marvel but 11yos winning our Group 1s is not what I crave for our sport. Apparently he’ll be straight outside The Gold Ace, making it a war which is great however with the 400K Gp 1 next week, I'll be surprised if gutbuster number 100 is in Lance’s mind. Lance was quoted at the barrier draw that Smoken Up “never gets an easy run” which is ironic considering how he’s driven him all his career. Either way, he doesn't handle the corners at Ballarat (so we keep hearing) so I'll be risking him as a winning hope.

Abettorpunt must be included in tricks as he will hold the favourites back & has a kick when clear. Despite no sprint lane, runs tend to appear at this level.

Local Restrepo is a minor hope if Gavin Lang can produce one of his ice-cool gems.

VERDICT

At the odds I'll be backing Caribbean Blaster & Christen Me & hoping Lance drives his usual race.

The Kiwis have won the last three Cups including a 100/1 blowout when Highview Tommy grabbed a last stride win. With the 400K Hunter Cup firmly in the sights of most,lets hope the spectre of that prize doesn't compromise what is traditionally an epic contest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also, ...

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur...