Skip to main content

Coronation Cup preview

There's more than just one Group 1 race on Derby day, the Coronation Cup is the traditional test for older horses but once again it's dominated by St Nicholas Abbey. Returning to the blog is regular contributor @lara_pocock with her look at this time-honoured contest.

----------------------

Coronation Cup

The Group One Coronation Cup over the Derby course and distance is held in the lead up to the big race and has been won the last two years by the Aidan O'Brien-trained St Nicholas Abbey. The six-year-old is set to take on four rivals in this year's renewal, which means the five runner race is a betting dream if the odds-on favourite hacks up as easily as everyone expects.

The ground at Epsom is officially given as good to soft, although with another dry day forecast this could change.

1. Chamonix (25-1) - A lightly raced four-year-old from the O'Brien stable who is likely to act as pacemaker here. He has won three of his five starts, including two Listed races, and has been off the track since October last year.

2. Chapter Seven (66-1) - Another four-year-old who is likely to be the pacemaker for Dunaden, with the two being owned by Pearl Bloodstock. Trained by Stuart Williams, Chapter Seven has not won above handicap level and was third in the Spring Cup over a mile at Newbury on 20 April. He is another who is unlikely to trouble the principals here once his role has been completed.

3. Dunaden (3-1) - The Melbourne and Caulfield Cup winner never disappoints and is the one who could topple St Nicholas Abbey here if the betting is an indication. He ran a good race when third behind the German-trained Pastorius in the Group One Prix Ganay at Longchamp on 28 April after putting in some solid efforts on the international stage in Hong Kong and Dubai. Has never run at Epsom but should put in a fine performance.

4. Joshua Tree (10-1) - Disappointing when sixth in the Group Two Yorkshire Cup for new connections but jockey Ryan Moore got the best out of him last season when winning the Group Two Prix Kergorlay. Another Epsom debutant, who has won two Grade One Canadian International races. He is the third choice but can often surprise.

5. St Nicholas Abbey (2-5) - Having won the Group One Racing Post Trophy as a juvenile big things were expected of this son of Montjeu. Although disappointing at three in his Classic season he has regained respect with four Group One under his belt. St Nicholas Abbey has not put a foot wrong this season, winning the Group One Dubai Sheema Classic over this distance, in which Dunaden was fourth, at Meydan on Dubai World Cup night. If the same horse turns up today he will be very difficult to beat. Before this race last year St Nicholas Abbey was second in a Group Three when odds on after a trip to Dubai, the longer recovery time may have helped but this does need to be noted.

With an odds-on favourite in a five runner race there is not much value to be had, with the only possible threats Dunaden, who is again aiming for a trip to Melbourne for the Spring Carnival, and Joshua Tree, who can be rather in and out. I cannot see the favourite being beaten, although his disappointing performance after he returned from international travel last season is a worry as he has been fragile in the past.

At 10-1 Joshua Tree is certainly worth backing each-way for the second place and I would put him in for the forecast with the favourite. He can often surprise with a big run and maybe the change of scenery and regime has taken a while to agree with him. Dunaden has not won in Europe since April 2011, when he took the Group Three Prix de Barbeville, and connections will be aiming to protect his mark for this year's cups.

The two pacemakers are outclassed here, with Chamonix the better of the two and if he gets a head start on the rest of the field he could finish a surprising third.

1. St Nicholas Abbey
2. Joshua Tree
3. Chamonix

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also, ...

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur...