Skip to main content

Tom Waterhouse has to be stopped...

.. or the whole Australian betting industry will suffer for it.

If you have seen any Australian sports broadcasts lately, no matter where you are in the world, then Tom Waterhouse probably annoys you. Multiply that by 100 if you live in Australia and are subject to all the commercials, advertorials and other forms if intrusive advertising he spends millions on. Just look on Twitter during a live NRL game and witness how much hatred there is the guy.

Below is a sample of an excellent article by a contemporary at On The Punt, @onthepunt, the original Australian sports betting news site, detailing how much damage the Waterhouse omnipresence is doing to the Australian industry.

Waterhouse: Has to be stopped

How is it possible that sports betting has become so on the nose in recent times?

We have a couple of hundred thousand highly addictive, socially destructive monsters known as poker machines scattered on every street corner doing untold damage every day, yet the relatively minor pursuit of sports betting is suddenly on every wowser's agenda.

Politicians are talking about it. Seemingly sensible journalists in the mainstream media are talking about it.



Even the general community seems to be exhibiting a level of ill-feeling that in recent times has only been reserved for the likes of the Federal Labor Party.

As far as I'm concerned, most of the criticism comes down to two words: Tom Waterhouse.

.
.
.
Read the complete article at OnThePunt.

Comments

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...
33 comments
Read more

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur...
14 comments
Read more