Skip to main content

Olympic swimming - Monday preview

Concerns about yesterday's card proved right, dropped one unit, so back to +4.17 units, from a turnover of five units (corrected). Now that the 400m races are out of the way, it makes the tipping schedule much easier to manage....

MONDAY

Men's 200m Freestyle

What a race this looks to be. Sun Yang won the 400m with a world record, Ryan Lochte started the week with a 400IM gold and is the current world champion,, Yannick Agnel swam a phenomenal final lap to claim gold for France in the 4x100 relay, and the winner of the first semi, Paul Biedermann, holds the world record (from the textile suit era).

A couple of interesting facts from the Olympic history books - nobody has ever won back-to-back golds in this event (no danger of that here with Phelps not entered) and at 23, Phelps is the oldest to have ever won the gold. Ryan Lochte is 27, so that's one down if you believe in form trends. Biedermann is 25, so he's pensioned off as well.

Agnel came from behind Lochte in the relay and beat him - a 0.75s faster split. He had also swum nearly half a second quicker in the semi for this event an hour earlier. I can't see Lochte winning this. Whilst I am wary of the Chinese swimmer, I can't make him favourite off that race plus his semi result. Sun didn't swim a relay last night, while Agnel and Lochte had to - so it's only logical they left something in the tank. It's between the two 20 year-olds for me, prefer the Frenchman off the back of the relay plus he has the three fastest times of 2012. He should be favourite.

2pts Agnel 3.0 Sportingbet/Coral, (bet down to 2.5)

Men's 100 Back

Matt Grevers has a gap on this field, and is likely to go very close to Peirsol's world record. At the US Trials, he was close pressed in the heats by a couple of rivals swimming just over 53 secs. He then took over a second off his time in the final. There's plenty left in the tank, and I don't think he is as short as he should be. Lacourt can go quick but he hasn't swam the sort of time he will need to win here since 2010.

If 1.20 is your game, then you should be backing Grevers. It's not for me though.

Women's 100 Breast

This race should have been a procession for Rebecca Soni, WC winner of 2009 and 2011, but only took silver in Beijing behind Leisel Jones. Such is her dominance at the distance, she had the fastest eight times in the world last year, and the top few in 2012. But that was before the emergence of 15yo Lithuanian Ruta Meilutyte yesterday. The UK-based teenager ripped out the two fastest times of the year in the preliminaries, so what can she do in a final? As such an inexperienced swimmer, does she go faster with youthful innocence, or does she think about it trying to sleep, and then notice she has the world no.1 in the next lane when they reach the blocks?

Soni can break 1.05 while Meilutyte needs to go forward again to do that. Will reality hit home? I can't have the new kid at odds-on. She might just do a Shiwen Ye and take the world mark with her, but leave me out of her price.

There's a bit of 2.5 around for Soni, I'd prefer to be on the mature head with big race experience in a clash like this.

1pt Soni 2.62 Bet 365 (bet down to 2.45)

Women's 100 Back

Emily Seebohm is back in town. After a lengthy break due to a nasty bout of swine flu, she set the textile suits record in the heats and then went close to it again in the semi. The hype around Missy Franklin is huge, but she is quite a chunk behind Seebohm still.

Aussie bookies will go mighty short on the daughter of a former Glenelg footballer, somewhere around 1.2 seems right. I'd be willing to lay if she was closer to 1.1.

No bet.

Comments

  1. Excellent Olympic reviews, Scott. Much appreciated. Thanks for putting them out.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also, ...

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur...