Skip to main content

exchange betting heading to New Jersey racing?

Racing in many states of the US is really struggling. The Off-Track Betting (OTB) of New York is millions in debt (how you can run a monopoly tote at a loss is beyond belief), broadcast rights are a mess, politicians in Arizona thought it was a great idea to ban online betting altogether, Californian racetracks are being sold off to property developers or lobbying to increase takeout rates and trainers who are banned for doping offences in one state can simply up sticks and move to another. With the exception of a handful of tracks, it's a basket case.

New Jersey moves forward with betting exchange plans


This week New Jersey state assembly unanimously voted (78-0) in favour of a bill that would authorise a Betfair-style betting exchange for state residents on horse racing. Like everything in the US, it's restricted by state, but..

"The bill also provides that exchange bets submitted on a given market on the exchange in New Jersey may, under approved conditions, be matched with exchange bets on the same horse race or set of horse races submitted by residents of jurisdictions outside of the state to an authorised exchange operator in that jurisdiction."

meaning if they wanted to, they could partner up with Betfair and A - get them to run it, because they know how to do it, and B - it could link up with Betfair's US racing markets available to the rest of the world, so there is genuine liquidity in the markets.

Also, from NJ approves exchange-style wagering

"Language in the bill calls for money generated from exchange wagering to be committed to state tracks and horsemen but it is not specific. The bill does call for a review of the initial agreement in 2014 at which time the state’s horsemen will have the option to modify it."

The involvement of the state's horsemen is worrying because in virtually every other state they have been dead against any reduction in tote takeouts which according to just about every business study ever commissioned, will lead to higher turnover and thus greater profits. Horsemen are not businesspeople, they are predominantly stubborn folk stuck in the past.

This is a promising development for wagering in the US, but once the proposal starts gathering momentum, wait for the lobbying from the anti-factions over the old chestnut of laying a horse to lose, all stakeholders wanting too much out of the deal thus making the whole point of exchange betting (low margins) a waste of time, and then probably some more stupid politics from another state.

Too many fingers in the pie will bring it down. Exchange betting with 15% commission won't work.




NB To my American readers, please feel free to pick me up on any factual errors or misconceptions in the opening paragraph.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also,

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...