Skip to main content

the Woods family Christmas portrait



I reckon every divorce lawyer in the US is getting excited at the moment. Yes, he's been a bad boy but I think a lot of it is down to him missing out on the prime of his social life because of his utter devotion to golf. When you haven't had a chance to 'sow the seeds', especially when you have everything going for you, that itch is always going to be there....

So worst case scenario, he loses half a billion dollars in a divorce settlement. Don't cry too much for him, he'd still have more money left than 99% of sportspeople combined....
Labels:

Comments

  1. Anthony4 December 2009 at 02:30

    Tiger's prenup would be bulletproof I'd imagine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Last Chance Trader4 December 2009 at 10:41

    LOL - It's nice to know that even the best have issues in life!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Scott4 December 2009 at 10:51

    Even with a pre-nup, after five years, two kids and him being naughty, the American legal system will be beyond ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fernando Vázquez de Prada11 December 2009 at 17:32

    Good afternoon¡¡

    Sorry for my english, i´m triying to improve it, but in this moment it isn´t very good. I write you for because I have seen your web and i would like you to visit my blog of golf bets:

    http://betfan.blogspot.com/

    In it, I continue a strategy for first days of golf tournaments (European Tour, PGATour, Australian TOur). I begin it in this other web:

    http://foroapuestas.forobet.com/estrategias-de-apuestas-deportivas/30890-descubriendo-al-golfista-tapado.html

    I would like you give your opinion for my strategy. And if you like it i could put a link to your blog. We can coloborate if you want it.

    Thank you very much¡¡¡ And again sorry my bad English¡¡

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...
33 comments
Read more

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur...
14 comments
Read more