Skip to main content

Racing NSW locked in a time warp

Is it really 1973 in Sydney, or just in the ivory towers that Peter V'Landys lives in? The guy is that out-of-touch with his thinking that he surely still believes the world is flat.

Yesterday the Australian Federal Government Productivity Commission released a report into the gambling industry in Australia. It delved deeply into problem gambling, advertising laws, online operations at home and abroad, hypocrisy of racing authorities and TABs, and all the other related issues. From what I've read, and there are 630 pages of it, it appears to be quite a balanced report. It outlines how the world has changed, how competition improves businesses and for the end consumer. It outlines how the ban on online casinos for Australians was a waste of time. And many other stories. If you fancy a few days of bedtime reading, you can download it here.

Naturally, the muppet in charge at Racing NSW has come out and slaughtered it because the researchers actually believe in life after black and white TV.

Lame argument trying to justify the stance of Racing NSW

The Australian's response with quotes from King Muppet and Betfair's Andrew Twaits:

Gambling on the future

V'landys argues that taxation on turnover is easier to administer across a number of betting operators who offer different types of wagering.

"It is the most competitively-neutral method of applying the fee," he said.


There's no neutrality in Racing NSW's case. They want to price every competitor of their bed partner TABCorp out of the market.

And they have a very cosy deal, signed by some idiot in the past, whereby TABCorp actually pay the fees to interstate racing bodies because NSW is actually a net importer of racing product. The racing is so poor in Sydney (specifically because of continually small fields and shoddily prepared tracks which can't stand up to overracing) that NSW residents see bit to bet more on the other states than they do on their own home product. Sure it has its good days, but overall the quality doesn't stand up. Punters do not bet anywhere near as much on regular fields of five or six horses - except on Betfair.. perhaps they should do a deal? ;)

Victoria continue to attract the best administrators in the business, with the Western Australian Turf Club's chief executive Alasdair Robertson taking over at the Melbourne Racing Club from the start of 2010. Perth racing has improved in leaps and bounds in recent years. Meanwhile NSW continue to bicker over selling tracks, desperately needed club mergers and the whole ship is controlled by a muppet.

Will November 16 be the date for the final nail in his coffin, when Racing NSW get laughed out of court in the case against Betfair and Sportsbet over the racefields fee legislation? Or will he not be held accountable for his moronic rants and lack of understanding of modern business and law?

Comments

  1. I've said it before and I'll say it again.

    Peter V'Landys is the most incompetant CEO of any organisation in Australia. How this idiot got promoted to the job is a mystery. He makes a good bedfellow with that other fool, Robert Nason from Tabcorp.

    Someone needs to launch an enquiry after this court case on how much money Racing NSW has actually leaked in lost court cases - and most of them were foregone conculsions to be lost as well.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Who at Racing NSW continues to let V'Landys publish these thoughts? Do the board agree with these thoughts? If not, why is he allowed to continue to open his mouth? If they do, they should be held accountable too

    Has racing in NSW moved forward under his watch? Why not?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also, ...

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur...