Skip to main content

Aussie bookie goes bust... or just gets bored?

Rumours abound this morning about the demise of RacingOdds (.com.au), the bookmaking arm of leviathan, or should it be big-mouth, Australian punter Sean Bartholomew. The website has disappeared (although other Aus firms have recently been subject to DDoS attacks and are still having issues), but there have been grave doubts about the longevity of this business for a while, with the proprietor believed to have been looking for a buyer for some time. If it is just hacker problems, then it's poor publicity for the company not to immediately send out emails to all clients reassuring them the firm is still operating, as Sportingbet and Sportsbet did last month.

Punter funds will be safe - that's the benefit of the tight licensing laws in Australia. Each bookmaker puts up a hefty security bond with their licensing authority, to be distributed to punters in the event of financial insolvency.

It is quite possible that Bartholomew has simply given up on an unviable business and closed the doors rather than bleed to death. He is also a massive punter; if more time was being spent punting (as per the old days) rather than taking bets because of a small client base, then what's the point of paying for a licence? Note - there is nothing wrong at all with bookies being punters, so long as they aren't playing with client funds. The new breed of Australian pro-active bookmakers means taking the best prices elsewhere, doing your own form, using information gained from clients - winning punter A is very good on this sport, so let him have his bet, cut the price and back that selection elsewhere for the hose, and taking risks. Wouldn't you rather that than the stale UK method of cutting everyone back to a fiver after you land a few winners??

Their prices were almost all cloned from other sources, after all the hoopla and propaganda about 'we will not close any punter down' they became the fastest trigger in Australia to shut people down, and they didn't have the resources of the big corporates to spend the big $$ required to reach the recreational punters based in the rest of Australia. Just because he got his mug on the spring racing carnival coverage a few times blowing his own trumpet didn't mean punters were going to flock to him. The bookmaking industry is full of egos, and in times when there are endless choices for where to bet, they turn most people off....

Bookmaking is not an easy game - and this business plan was doomed to fail. Winning punters do not make winning bookmakers, and even then big Sean was rumoured to have gone bust as a punter at least once as well. Sometimes it just takes a wise man to walk away - exactly what has happened will no doubt surface soon enough...

UPDATE - Racingodds.com.au has been sold to Matthew Tripp's Sportsbet (51% owned by PaddyPower).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also,

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...